[LUNA] Reply-To discussion

[John Price]

OK. It's done.
On Apr 24, 2013 4:57 AM, "Kris Kirby" <kris at catonic.us> wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> > > Typically, in a group like LUNA, replies to posts are intended as
> > > edification for the group. By changing the default behavior to reply
> > > to the sender, as opposed to the group, means that either a lot of
> > > messages are sent twice (once to the user, then, oops, once to the
> > > group) or never received by the entire group. In the first case, the
> > > original sender receives two copies of the reply. In the second, the
> > > rest of us answer the same question the same way 32 more times back
> > > to the original sender.
> > >
> > > I like reply-to the group. I'd rather the EXCEPTION be to reply to the
> > > sender.
> > >
> > > -Bob
> > >
> > > PS The default behavior seems to be reply-to-sender, at the moment. I
> had to
> > > press "Reply-to-All" after I started this message.
>
> Reply to group, like every other mailing list on the planet &
> Yahoogroups.
>
> You had to click something after you started the message? I had to
> read, think, and respond to a prompt before I started typing this!
>
> *shakes fist*
>
> *trips over something unseen, knocks over a stack of punch cards*
>
> Oh noes! My memoirs!
>
> --
> Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
> Disinformation Analyst
> </troll>
> _______________________________________________
> LUNA mailing list
> LUNA at lunagroup.us
> http://lunagroup.us/mailman/listinfo/luna
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lunagroup.us/pipermail/luna/attachments/20130424/0c131206/attachment.html>